Rutgers IODP Core Repository

Obtaining Samples

Samples are available to all scientific investigators following the general principles outlined by the IODP core policy. Samples from Leg 150X and 174AX are processed first through IODP; other sample requests may be directed to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Curator. The following web pages are designed to inform colleagues about the scientific research opportunities provided by these cores and procedures for obtaining samples and data. Datasets and cores are available following a two-year post-drilling moratorium period.

Core Sampling Policy

This document outlines the policy and procedures for distributing ODP Leg 150X and 174AX samples and other cores archived in the Rutgers core repository to research scientists, curators, and educators. This document also defines the obligations that sample and data recipients incur. The specific objectives of the Rutgers sampling policy are to:

1. ensure availability of samples and data to scientific party members so they can fulfill the objectives of the drilling projects;
2. encourage scientific analysis over a wide range of research disciplines by providing samples to the scientific community;
3. preserve core material as an archive for future description and observations, for nondestructive analyses, and for sampling; and disseminate scientific results.

Sampling Guidelines

1. Routine samples are 10-20 cc maximum per meter for initial sampling;
2. Closely spaced sampling (e.g., 10 cc every 10 cm) needs to be justified by initial analyses; toothpick samples may be taken for survey work every 10 cm;
3. Sample requests for 100’s samples need to be justified by initial results;
4. Sampling critical intervals (e.g., PETM. K/Pg, ETE) precludes sampling within 50 cm of the boundary; sampling within 50 cm requires prior authorization of the SAC.

Sample Distribution

Samples are generally distributed for research projects that can be completed within two to three years. Samples are given or loaned to persons in the following four categories:

1. Scientists who wish to conduct research on ODP materials and to publish the results; all requests for samples from ODP material must be requested through IODP http://iodp.tamu.edu/curation/samples.html No ODP material may leave Rutgers without approval of the IODP.
2. Curators of museums and collections; approval for loans must be approved by either the IODP (for IODP material) or our sampling committee (for non-IODP material). Terms of the loan are variable, but are typically 2-3 years with the possibility for renewal.
3. Educators. Only cores specifically designated for teaching (along with attendant teaching materials) will be loaned and only for periods generally not to exceed two weeks. No sampling of teaching cores is allowed without specific approval of the sampling committee.

Obtaining Samples from Non-ODP cores

Scientists who wish to conduct research on non-ODP/IODP material archived at Rutgers (e.g., Newark Basin Drilling Project, ACE Passaic Tunnel, NJGS, and USGS cores) need to fill out a sample request form (download form by clicking here). The sample request forms should be directed to Jim Browning, Curator, after appropriate moratoria periods (normally 2 years post drilling). The Repository sampling committee will need to evaluate the requests including: unusually large requests, whole-round samples, sampling to completion, or removal of entire core boxes from the Rutgers campus for any purpose.

Rutgers-IODP Sampling Advisory Committee

Kenneth G. Miller, Director Rutgers-IODP Core Repository, Rutgers EPS
James V. Browning, Curator, Rutgers-IODP Core Repository, Rutgers EPS
Paul E. Olsen, Storke Professor of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Columbia University and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Dennis V. Kent, Board of Governors Professor Emeritus, Rutgers EPS and Adjunct Senior Research Scientist, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
James D. Wright, Professor and Chair, Rutgers EPS

Bass River Corehole

Bass River Data Table Bass River Site Report Bass River Map Bass River lithology figures color BR gamma 0-445 BR gamma 293-1027 BR gamma 995-1565 BR gamma 1560-1685 BR gamma 1627-1936

Ancora Corehole

Ancora A Data Table Ancora B Data Table Ancora Site Report Ancora Map Ancora gamma log

Ocean View Corehole

Ocean View A Data Table Ocean View B Data Table Ocean View Site Report Ocean View Map

Bethany Beach Corehole

Bethany Beach Data Table Bethany Beach Site Report Bethany Beach Map

Fort Mott Corehole

Fort Mott Data Table Fort Mott Site Report Fort Mott Map

Millville Corehole

Millville Data Table Millville Site Report Millville Map

Sea Girt Corehole

Sea Girt Data Table Sea Girt Site Report Sea Girt Map

Cape May Zoo Corehole

Cape May Zoo Data Table Cape May Zoo Site Report Cape May Zoo Map

Medford NJ Corehole

Medford Data Table Medford Site Report Medford SR appendix Medford Map

Double Trouble NJ Corehole

Double Trouble Data Table Double Trouble Site Report Double Trouble Map

Wilson Lake Corehole

Wilson Lake Data Table Wilson Lake Site Report Wilson Lake Map

Island Beach Corehole

Island Beach Data Table Island Beach Site Report Island Beach Map

Atlantic City Corehole

Atlantic City Data Table Atlantic City Site Report Atlantic City Map Atlantic City VCD's

Cape May Corehole

Cape May Data Table Cape May Site Report Cape May Map Cape May VCD's 1-50 Cape May VCD's 51-100 Cape May VCD's 101-150 Cape May VCD's 151-200 Cape May VCD's 201-215

The Coastal Plain Drilling Project is the onshore portion of the Ocean Drilling Program/Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (ODP/IODP) New Jersey sea level/Mid-Atlantic Transect. The Transect focuses on reconstructing global sea-level variations during the past 100 m.y. and global events in Earth History (Figure 1). Eleven onshore coreholes have been continuously cored and logged as part of the Transect.

Funding

The Coastal Plain Drilling Project is funded by the National Science Foundation (Earth Science Division, Continental Dynamics Program and Ocean Science Division, Ocean Drilling Program), the New Jersey Geological Survey (NJGS), the Delaware Geological Survey, and the United States Geological Survey Eastern Earth Surface Processes Team (EESPT).

Coreholes

Recognizing the link between onshore drilling and offshore drilling by Ocean Drilling Program Legs 150 (Mountain, Miller, Blum, et al., 1994) and 174A (Austin, Christie-Blick, Malone, et al., 1997), the JOIDES Planning Committee (PCOM) designated onshore drilling as Leg 150X (Island Beach, Atlantic City, and Cape May coreholes; Miller et al., 1994, 1996; Miller and Snyder, eds., 1997) and 174AX (Bass River, Ancora, Ocean View, Bethany Beach, Fort Mott, Millville, Sea Girt, Cape May Zoo, Medford, Double Trouble, and Wilson Lake coreholes; Miller et al., 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2006, in prep.; Sugarman et al., 2004, 2005, 2007, 2010; Browning et al. in prep.).

Leg 150X. Onshore drilling began in 1993 with drilling of the Island Beach (total depth [TD] 1223 ft in the uppermost Cretaceous) and Atlantic City coreholes (TD 1452 ft in upper middle Eocene strata; Miller et al., 1994). Drilling continued in 1994 at Cape May (Miller et al., 1996; TD 1500 ft in upper Eocene strata) to complete ODP Leg 150X onshore drilling. These three sites targeted Oligocene-Miocene sequences, trying to unravel Icehouse sea-level changes (Miller and Mountain, 1994; Miller et al., 1996, 1998).

Leg 174AX. Onshore drilling continued as ODP leg 174AX by continuously coring at:

1. Bass River in Oct.-Nov. 1996 (TD 1956.5 ft in Cenomanian strata; Miller, Sugarman, Browning, et al., 1997), targeting Upper Cretaceous to Paleocene strata poorly sampled by Leg 150X;
2. Ancora in July-Aug. 1998, an updip, less deeply buried Cretaceous-Paleocene section complimentary to Bass River (TD 1170 ft in Cenomanian strata; Miller, Sugarman, Browning, et al., 1999);
3. Ocean View in Sept.-Oct. 1999, targeting upper Miocene-middle Eocene sequences (TD 1575 ft in lowermost Eocene strata; Miller, Sugarman, Browning, Pekar, et al., 2001); and
4. Bethany Beach, DE in May-June 200, targeting the thick Miocene sequences in the depocenter of the Salisbury Embayment in collaboration with the Delaware Geological Survey (TD 1470 ft in uppermost Oligocene strata; Miller, McLaughlin, Browning, et al., 2002).
5. Ft. Mott (Oct. 2001), targeting aquifers in Coniacian through Aptian sediments. The Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer was found to consist of thick apparently continuous delta front sands of the transgressive systems tract overlain by anastomosing river facies of the highstand systems tract. (TD 820 ft in Lower Cretaceous [Aptian/?Barremian] strata; Sugarman et al., 2004).
6. Millville, NJ (May-June 2002) targeting Late Cretaceous sequences from southern New Jersey. Cretaceous sequences at Millville are more similar to sections in Delaware (with a thin Magothy formation and less deltaic influence) than they are to sections in northern New Jersey suggesting the South Jersey High was influencing sedimentation patterns at that time. (TD 1500 ft in Upper Cretaceous [Cenomanian] strata; Sugarman et al., 2005).
7. Sea Girt (September-November 2003) targeting Late Cretaceous sequences from northern New Jersey. Direct ties between lithofacies and gamma logs at Sea Girt have allowed the mapping of Cretaceous sequences and sedimentation patterns throughout northern New Jersey. (TD 1600 ft in lower Miocene strata; Miller et al., 2006).
8. Cape May Zoo (September-October 2004) targeting middle Miocene through Pleistocene sequences. Continuing studies are helping define the distribution of Miocene sequences and aquifers in the Cape May peninsula. (TD 720 ft in Upper Cretaceous [Cenomanian] strata; Sugarman et al., 2007).
9. Medford (April-May, 2007) targeted Cretaceous sequences and aquifers. Helped define the regional extent of sequences first descrbed in the Ft. Mott core (TD 1090 ft in Lower Cretaceos strata [Aptian/?Barremian]; Sugarman et al. 2010)
10. Double Trouble (October, 2008) targeted Oligocene and late to middle Eocene sequences and aquifers and the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary (TD 858 ft in Upper Cretaceous strata [Maastrichtian]; Browning et al., in prep.)
11. Wilson Lake (May 2011) targeted the Paleocene-Eocene and the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundaries (TD 460 ft in Upper Cretaceous strata [Maastrichtian]; Miller et al., in prep.).
12. Sandy Hook - North Maintenance Yard (May 2014) three holes were drilled at Sandy Hook to understand the Quaternary evolution of the spit and to understand the differential sinking rate between coastal plain and bedrock locations.
13. Sandy Hook - South Maintenance Yard (May 2014) three holes were drilled at Sandy Hook to understand the Quaternary evolution of the spit and to understand the differential sinking rate between coastal plain and bedrock locations.
14. Sandy Hook - Salt Shed (May 2014) three holes were drilled at Sandy Hook to understand the Quaternary evolution of the spit and to understand the differential sinking rate between coastal plain and bedrock locations.
15. Sandy Hook - South Maintenance Yard - Deep Hole (October-November 2014) was drilled to help understand the facies and continuity of aquifer units in the Magothy Formation (Coniacian-?Santonian) and to determine the depth and nature of bedrock.

In total, these coreholes recovered 14,928.7 ft from 18,793.5 ft drilled (79% recovery).

Scientific Accomplishments

Successful drilling onshore in the New Jersey Coastal Plain (onshore ODP Legs 150X and 174AX) and offshore on the NJ shelf and slope (ODP Legs 150, 174A) has provided:

1. ages for major Late Cretaceous-Cenozoic sequence boundaries;
2. causal links between the formation of sequence boundaries and the growth of ice sheets between ca. 42 and ca. 10 Ma, and hints that such a link exists in the older, supposedly ice-free world (e.g., ca. 71 Ma);
3. preliminary estimates of the amplitudes of global sea-level changes;
4. timing of major sea level falls and generation of new sea level curve for the Late Cretaceous to Recent;
5. evaluation of links among sequence stratigraphic architecture, global sea-level variations, and margin evolution; and
6. constraints on the causes of major global events in Earth history, including the middle Eocene-earliest Oligocene global cooling, the late Paleocene thermal maximum, the K/T boundary, early and late Maastrichtian events, and the Cenomanian/Turonian carbon extraction event.